Serving South Carolina and North Carolina, with offices in Greenville, Spartanburg and Charleston.

SE HABLA ESPAÑOL.

864-242-9008

South Carolina
Personal Injury Law Blog

When Patients Were Not Told the True Risks of a Procedure

A physician is required to inform you of the risks, benefits, and alternatives to any surgery or treatment before moving forward. If you suffered injuries after a physician did not disclose crucial information, legal relief may be available. At Parham Smith & Archenhold LLC, our Greenville medical malpractice lawyers are dedicated to helping injured persons obtain maximum damages following a provider’s misstep. If you or someone you love did not understand the risks of a procedure and were injured, our legal team would like to hear from you.

A physician or any healthcare professional is required to have a conversation with the patient regarding known risks, benefits, and alternative options prior to a procedure. The patient should be given the opportunity to ask questions and seek clarification on any parts of the procedure. Once the patient’s concerns have been addressed, the patient will provide written consent. The informed consent process allows a patient to be an active participant in his or her medical care.

Healthcare professionals should take a patient’s personal and religious beliefs into consideration when obtaining informed consent. If a certain procedure violates a patient’s values, then alternative approaches should be discussed. If a language barrier prevents a patient from understanding the details of a procedure, a language interpreter should be used to facilitate communication.

A patient who is unable to understand the nature of his or her medical condition or is unable to make an informed decision regarding their treatment cannot provide informed consent. According to SC Code §44-66-30, the following persons will be appointed to make medical decisions in their stead (in order of priority):

Can You Sue if You Were Not Informed of the Risks of a Procedure?

If you were not informed of the risks of a test or treatment and you suffered harm, you may recoup your losses. However, you must prove that if you knew about the potential risks, you would not have followed through with the procedure. Essentially, the risk must have been a material risk, or something that would prevent a reasonable person from undergoing a procedure.

For example, a craniotomy is used to treat patients who experience seizures. Potential risks include brain swelling, bleeding, and stroke. These are material risks since a reasonable person may think twice before going under the knife after learning about these potential complications. If a patient is not informed of these risks prior to surgery, then the physician did not obtain informed consent.

If you did not provide informed consent prior to going under the knife, the following evidence may support your claim:

Reach Out to Our Greenville Medical Malpractice Lawyers

At Parham Smith & Archenhold, LLC, our Greenville medical malpractice attorneys dedicate their professional lives to advocating for injured persons. You deserve compensation for subsequent medical bills and lost wages due to not having all the information. To schedule a free consultation, contact us online or by calling (864) 432-1796 today.